dcsimg
 

What the Heck is a Plackett-Burman Design, and Why Would I Want It?

Last time, we talked about why to use designs with just two levels. Now it’s time to discuss the two-level options in design of experiments, starting with Plackett-Burman designs.

Create Factorial Design with Plackett-Burman design selected

Plackett-Burman designs exist so that you can quickly evaluate lots of factors to see which ones are important. Plackett-Burman designs are often called “screening designs” because they help you screen out unimportant factors.

This fits in with our previously-stated goal for design of experiments: learn as much as possible from the smallest amount of data. If we’re not sure a factor is important, we don’t want to spend time and money collecting data about it.

An example of when to use a Plackett-Burman design 

For example, consider this lengthy, but less-than-comprehensive, list of factors that can contribute to vehicle accidents, based on James Harris’ article:

  1. Weather
  2. Lighting
  3. Roadside devices, like traffic signs
  4. Roadside activities, like construction
  5. Surface depositsThe Renault Laguna on the left collided with the Volkswagen Golf on the right.
  6. Road damage
  7. Road deterioration
  8. Road age
  9. Vehicle condition
  10. View obstructions
  11. Distractions
  12. Instruments
  13. Signaling devices
  14. Control sensation
  15. Comfort
  16. Automatic controls
  17. Vehicle Weight
  18. Performance
  19. Vehicle Width
  20. Vehicle Height
  21. Vehicle stability
  22. Vehicle speed
  23. Sensory capabilities
  24. Driver knowledge
  25. Driver judgment
  26. Driver attitude
  27. Driver alertness
  28. Driver health
  29. Driver skill
  30. Driver age
  31. Driver habits
  32. Driver weight
  33. Driver strength
  34. Driver freedom of movement

It’s likely that all of these factors contribute to accidents, but that some are much more important than others. Within design of experiments methods, the Plackett-Burman design is a good choice for figuring out which factors are most important. After the Plackett-Burman experiment was done, you could use a different experiment to answer questions like “Does the effect of vehicle speed depend on how damaged the road is?”

It's important to realize just how good Plackett-Burman designs are at reducing the amount of data we have to collect. For example, suppose that you want to find out which are the important factors when you have 15 to consider. For a Plackett-Burman design, you can estimate the effects of the different factors with as few as 20 data points. A General Full Factorial design for 15 factors, even if the factors have only 2 levels, would have 32,768 data points.

That’s a big difference.

Downsides of the Plackett-Burman designs

There are some downsides to this efficiency that you should know about when you prepare to use a Plackett-Burman design. Plackett-Burman designs won’t tell you if the effect of one factor depends on another factor. Also, if you run the smallest design you can, it doesn’t follow that you collect enough data to know what those effects are very precisely. In design of experiments, a Plackett-Burman design is a starting point, and you should use it intending to follow-up with more detailed experimentation.

Quick summary: Plackett-Burman designs are helpful when you have a lot of potential factors, and need to figure out the vital few that will help you solve problems and make decisions. Plackett-Burman designs are great when we want to use design of experiments to learn as much as possible from the smallest amount of data.

Fearless Data Analysis

Minitab 17 gives you the confidence you need to improve quality.

Download the Free Trial


 

Comments

Name: G.Manikandan • Tuesday, October 15, 2013

A guide on how to design for this experiment and how to interprete the results would be more beneficial and that would be highly appreciated.


Name: Cody Steele • Monday, October 21, 2013

Hello Mr. Manikandan,
I'm thankful for your suggestion about what you'd like to see. Hopefully, we can add more in-depth examples of Plackett-Burman designs to the blog in the future.

The blog does contain some discussion about how to design and interpret the results from other experiments. While not a comprehensive list, I think that you might find these two part series helpful. The first parts discuss planning and creating while the second parts interpret the results.

**A DOE in a manufacturing environment**

http://blog.minitab.com/blog/applying-statistics-in-quality-projects/a-doe-in-a-manufacturing-environment-part-1

http://blog.minitab.com/blog/applying-statistics-in-quality-projects/a-doe-in-a-manufacturing-environment-part-2

**Build a DIY Catapult for DOE**

http://blog.minitab.com/blog/statistics-in-the-field/build-a-diy-catapult-for-doe-design-of-experiments-part-1

http://blog.minitab.com/blog/statistics-in-the-field/build-a-diy-catapult-for-doe-design-of-experiments-part-2

**Design of Experiments with Pierogies**

http://blog.minitab.com/blog/understanding-statistics/celebrate-national-pierogi-day-with-design-of-experiments-doe

http://blog.minitab.com/blog/understanding-statistics/design-of-experiments-doe-with-pierogies-part-ii-results

Thank you again for your suggestion!
Cody


blog comments powered by Disqus