What does the eyesight of a homeless person have in common with complications from dental anesthesia? Or with reducing side-effects from cancer? Or monitoring artificial hip implants?
These are all subjects of recently published studies that use statistical analyses in Minitab to improve healthcare outcomes. And they're a good reminder that when we improve the quality of healthcare for others, we improve it for ourselves.
Using t-tests in Minitab, they determined that the homeless population tend to have more eye problems and greater need for visual care than the general population. Although vision problems might appear to be a secondary issue for those facing the constellation of severe, chronic problems often associated with homelessness, researchers point out that even something simple as a spectacle correction can substantially improve a person's quality of life. BMC Health Services Research 2016; 16:54.
They used a Pareto chart to identify the most common complications, and a binomial capability analysis to evaluate the rate of complications before and after implementing remedial measures. The results showed a significant reduction in complications from local anesthesia (pre-improvement % defective 7.99 (95% CI 6.65, 9.51), vs post-improvement % defective 4.58 (95% CI 3.58, 5.77). Journal Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2015;9(12) ZC34-ZC38.
The authors found a significant positive correlation between increased physical activity level and a higher quality of life, as well as less fatigue. Although the study didn't prove a causal connection, their results support other studies that suggest that physical activity may help preserve quality of life and reduce side effects during cancer treatment. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2016, 62(1).
What other types of quality improvement studies are being published in the fields of health and medicine? What are the overall trends for these studies? And how can the studies themselves be improved?
We'll look at that in my next post.