When designing a new product, even the smallest variations can add up to big problems. Whether it’s an engine assembly, a smartphone casing, or a medical device, each component must fit together precisely for the final product to function as intended. That’s where tolerance stack-up analysis comes in.
Tolerance stack-up analysis is used to optimize product design for assembly. Effectively, it is used to calculate the cumulative effects of part tolerances in an assembly. In general, most engineers understand the value of defining optimized tolerances per part, but may not consider the overall tolerances, particularly in an assembly and test environment. Tolerance stack-up analysis helps engineers predict how part variations combine in an assembly and whether the final result will meet specifications before the first prototype is ever built.
There are two primary approaches to tolerance stack-up analysis:
Worst-Case Analysis – This approach assumes all tolerances are at their extreme limits in the same direction. It’s simple and conservative thus guaranteeing fit, but often leading to over-engineering and unnecessary cost.
Monte Carlo Analysis – This approach uses probability distributions to model real-world variation. Instead of assuming the worst, it simulates thousands of assembly outcomes to estimate the likelihood of failure. This approach reflects reality more accurately and can justify looser (and cheaper) tolerances while maintaining performance.
Using Minitab Workspace’s Monte Carlo Simulation tool, engineers can quickly set up a tolerance model:
Tolerance stack-up analysis bridges the gap between design intent and manufacturing reality. By quantifying uncertainty, engineers make informed decisions that balance performance, cost, and manufacturability. While worst-case analysis may be more common and is still effective, Monte Carlo simulation will ultimately provide a more realistic approach, enabling looser tolerances and providing a more practical approach to design.