Using Binary Logistic Regression to Investigate High Employee Turnover

Human resources might not be a business area where you’d typically expect to conduct a Six Sigma project. However, Jeff Parks, Lean Six Sigma master black belt, found the opportunity to apply Six Sigma to human resources while leading quality improvement efforts at a large manufacturer of aerospace engine parts.

The manufacturer was suffering from high employee attrition, or turnover, and struggled to understand why. With a DMAIC Six Sigma project, Parks set out to work with the HR department to investigate and reduce the high turnover rates.

In 2009, the manufacturer had normal attrition rates of 15-18 percent, which mirrored general manufacturing attrition rates for the region where the company was based. However, the downturn of the U.S. economy in 2009 coincided with an increase in the company’s attrition rate, which soared to more than 30 percent. Given the high unemployment rates regionally and nationwide, management expected the rates to be much lower.

Human resources personnel at the manufacturer typically relied on exit interviews to understand why employees leave. While a lot can be learned from these interviews, there is no opportunity to conduct an exit interview when employees leave without warning. And in an hourly manufacturing environment where the work is very laborious, it was not uncommon for employees to quit unannounced, leaving behind little or no information about what prompted their departure. The manufacturer had compiled basic data about employees who had left their jobs unannounced over the past two years, and Parks took on the task of analyzing the data to see what insights it might offer about the sudden rise in attrition.

How Minitab Helped

The company had hired 100 employees over a span of two years. Of those new hires, 32 had quit unannounced. The company had basic information about each of the new hires, including the employee’s gender, position, pay classification, shift worked, prior years of manufacturing experience, and length of commute.

To see if statistically significant differences existed between the proportion of employees who quit across pay classifications (hourly vs. salary) and shifts worked (first shift vs. second shift), Parks performed hypothesis tests (Stat > Basic Statistics) in Minitab. He had hoped to reveal patterns in employee attrition behavior, but the analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the proportions for any of the variables.

But Parks didn’t stop there. He investigated the raw data further, and noticed that many of the employees who quit were females with prior manufacturing experience who traveled various distances to work. With Minitab charts, Parks was able to visualize raw data the company compiled about employees with attrition behavior. The histogram below outlines the distribution of commute distances for newly hired employees over the course of two years:

Minitab Histogram

He also used Minitab to find out if there was a correlation between gender, prior years of manufacturing experience, or commuting distance and whether or not the employee had left the company. In this case, the response Parks wanted to assess—quitting or not quitting—was binary and only had two possible values. Minitab’s powerful binary logistic regression analysis allowed Parks to create statistical models to predict which variables might have made a person more likely to quit.

Binary Logistic Menu Path in Minitab


The analysis revealed that the length of an employee’s commute was statistically significant:

Logistic Regression Table

The output from his Minitab analysis yielded a regression equation Parks could use to predict the probability of employees quitting based on the number of miles that made up their commute to work. He used the equation to analyze distances up to30 miles, and found that commuting distance had little impact on the probability of an employee quitting until the 12 mile mark. At 12 miles, the probability of an employee quitting increased to more than 18 percent. “And at 13 miles, which is about a 30-45 minute commute, the probability of quitting jumped to more than 92 percent,” Parks notes. “If the commute exceeds 13 miles, it is almost assured that an employee will quit.”

Revamping the Interview Process

The manufacturer’s HR department used the results of Parks’ analysis to revamp the interview process for manufacturing positions. They began to look more closely at the potential employee’s commuting distance and took this into account before making hiring decisions.

Parks believes the data explain the seeming paradox between a rising attrition rate and a time of high unemployment. “The analysis seemed to imply that during the recession, people were very liberal about the jobs they applied for because the economy was so bad,” says Parks. “Once employees realized that the commute could be arduous, they quickly went on to look for other jobs, and often would quit.”


Name: Ron Pereira • Wednesday, April 24, 2013

This makes me think of the book the 37 Signals guys wrote called "Rework." In this book they talk about the power of remote working... so, in this example, I wonder if the HR department would be wise enough to consider allowing these long commuters the option of working from home twice a week... or something like that.

My fear in analysis like this is that many lose focus and attempt to solve the wrong problem.

In other words, instead of assuming we shouldn't hire people with a long commute (i.e. weed them out during the interview process)... the team may better off attempting to find a way to reduce turnover no matter where the person lives.

Name: Carly • Thursday, April 25, 2013

Hi Ron - Thanks for contributing your perspective and for reading my post – you definitely raise a great point! -Carly

Name: Carly • Monday, April 29, 2013

Ron wrote a great post, entitled "Knee Jerk Statistics," that further explains the ideas in his comment above: http://lssacademy.com/2013/04/29/knee-jerk-statistics/

Thanks Ron, for keeping the discussion going!

Name: Greg W. • Monday, May 27, 2013

That is a very interesting study! Definitely valuable. Thanks for the link too Carly!

Name: Jean C • Thursday, May 30, 2013

great article.
i agree with Ron, to add to what he said, does the HR department considering changing the shift hours for the long distance commuters from 7 to 3, to 8 or 9 to 5, vise..vesa

Name: Carly Barry • Monday, June 3, 2013

Hi Greg - Thanks for reading!

blog comments powered by Disqus